Propaganda

The article on Opinions says people’s views come from four main sources. Let’s look at them to see how easily we can be manipulated. There must be some defense. Sources are:

  • Intuition (your gut feel)
  • Personal experience (what you’ve seen)
  • What you’ve been taught
  • What you’ve figured out for yourself

We’ll use the examples of Sigmund Freud and Chartered Schools to illustrate.

Freud

Freud lived between 1859 and 1939. He invented the theory of the subconscious mind. He also said man was inherently bad. His theory of the mind was something he figured out; the belief that man is naturally bad came from personal experience.

The subconscious mind is still being taught today (because it was brilliant), while what he derived from personal experience is no longer considered valid. But if you look at the time in which he lived, it makes sense. The late 1800s was before the implementation of mass education and early 1900s Europe was home to the First World War. So he saw people at their worst. Before modern efforts to arrive at a well-meaning consciousness.

Chartered schools

Jim and Brian were high school mates. Neither had ever experienced a charter school but both subscribed to hard-leaning websites that held staunch political views, albeit opposite. Jim’s websites taunted charter schools, exposing the devil inside. Brian’s credited the process with ingenuity and said people were lining up to get in. Then one day they had a fight about it and are no longer friends.

What happened is these buddies became foot soldiers for some propaganda’s cause. Convinced of their purpose, they began spewing nonsense exactly as masters intended. When things finally came to a head, one was googling “charter schools good” and the other “charter schools bad.”

Buying a book

Propaganda applies mostly to political situations but the same instruments are used by business. Everyone knows what advertisers are doing when presenting their wares but when it comes to politics, bias isn’t always as obvious.

I once bought a book about world issues. When paying, I asked if it was a good one. The clerk flipped it over to read the endorsements and said, “It depends. Are you a liberal?” I said, “Why does that matter?” He said, “Because all the endorsements are from liberal sources. So if you’re a liberal, you’ll like it. That’s the way poli-books work.”

Propaganda centres

According to Steve Jobs, Eastern culture relies heavily on intuition and personal experience, while the West places greater emphasis on what we’ve been taught. This explains why modern day propaganda works so well in America—it’s disguised as knowledge. Couple this with the “good student” phenomena to memorize and regurgitate and you have a nation for the taking.

Numerous propaganda centres spew nonsense on a daily basis, fueling foot soldiers to convince all their friends. Canadian stations are good but you still have to watch where you get news, especially when it comes from the States. People down there are trying to brainwash you. That’s the bottom line. We mask it with statements like “this is what I think” but the truth is: we don’t think anything. We only regurgitate what others have told us, adding absolutely nothing of what we instinctively feel, have experienced, or figured out for ourselves.

Summary

Wake up! This is our new reality. American news is selling an agenda in addition to telling you what happened today. So it’s work to get news without opinion. And this condition is not going to change anytime soon because it works.

In the public eye, politics has become a team sport, which is ridiculous because that’s not the way it’s supposed to be. And to make matters worse, every time a bias is exposed, adversaries use it to deny their opponent’s entire position—which is crazy. Real opinion involves considering all sides, recognizing bona fide points, and applying humility to whatever you discover because you’ll never have all the information. That’s the way intellectuals do it and they keep all their friends.

Power, Pleasure, Purpose

There are three popular schools of thought pertaining to what motivates people and drives our personalities (called the three Viennese schools of psychotherapy). They are the beliefs of Alfred Adler, Sigmund Freud, and Viktor Frankl. Adler believed we’re driven by power, Freud said we’re driven by pleasure, and Frankl believed we’re all driven towards some type of purpose. So let’s talk about them.

Adler

Adler (1870-1937) was an Austrian medical doctor who founded his own school of psychology. He broke away from Freud’s theories to ascertain that personalities are driven by our feelings of inferiority and that we spend much of our time combating (and trying to surmount) these feelings.

His most famous concept is the inferiority complex, which speaks to the problem of self-esteem and its negative effects on human health. He believed such complexes led to becoming egocentric, power-hungry, and aggressive (or worse). He also thought such complexes sometimes produced a paradoxical superiority striving. Adler was concerned with overcoming this superiority/inferiority dynamic and was one of the first psychotherapists to discard the analytic couch in favour of two chairs. He also believed in preventing future inferiority issues in children through democratic family structures and no corporal punishment (like, hard spankings).

Freud

Freud (1856-1939) was a neurologist who created a method of dealing with mental disorders through a dialog between doctor and patient. He’s also known for defining and introducing the unconscious mind, and inventing words like ego and id.

His pleasure principle was first discovered while watching Italian guys messing with chicks at a beach. And the man was spot on. Now Sigmund said and did many great things, but for the purpose of this article he said the mind has a strong tendency to seek pleasure and avoid pain.

Frankl

Viktor Frankl (1905-1997) was a holocaust survivor who wrote Man’s Search for Meaning. This book is divided into two sections. The first describes his life inside a World War II concentration camp, the second presents his views on what motivates people. The summary of his beliefs is that we’re all driven to achieve some kind of purpose.

Frankl compares his analysis to the other two schools as follows: The striving to find a meaning in one’s life is the primary motivational force in man. That’s why I speak of a will to meaning in contrast to the “pleasure principle” (or will to pleasure) of Freud, or the will of power stressed by Adler.

Who are you?

Much of psychology was formulated during this time. And it’s now becoming apparent that, when it comes to describing the human mind, one size does not fit all. Today, we accept multiple theories to describe multiple types of people.

When you think of it, there are probably all three motivations living inside us. Don’t we all seek pleasure? Doesn’t everyone have a bit of an inferiority complex? Don’t we all search for meaning? And if you think even further, we could probably identify with one as being dominant. Most people could say something like, “I’m 70% pleasure, 20% purpose, and 10% power.” So who are you?